#Process lasso probalance Pc

That means, E-Cores disabled gives me better performance than running the CPU with them enabled.Ĭan you explain how you set specific processes to certain cores? Is it simply via unchecking and checking what cores are on or off in the CPU Affinity menu? Thank you. Tought this info is important for every 12th/13th gen Intel user that wants to get the most out of their expensive CPUs.Īdy, is that MSFS and for example the FENIX AddOn dont work very well with the E-Cores. The result was amazing! A big improvement in FPS and most importantly, a very, very smooth experience with lots of short stutters/hickups gone!

All the FENIX processes also went to the P-Cores aswell, as most of this AddOn runs externally as processes (Display rendering etc.). MSFS.exe i assigned, of course, to all the P-cores and giving it high priority and a high performance powerplan. Installed ProcessLasso, created a “default” profile with no changes and then created a “MSFS” Profile, so i can easily switch depending on how im using the PC.įor MSFS, i just started all the programs i need when using MSFS (Volanta, Spad.Next, VA-Tracker, AVIA Server, etc.etc…) Then i just selected ALL running processes with Ctrl-A und put them all on the 4 E-Cores. That means, E-Cores disabled gives me better performance than running the CPU with them enabled.īut, its kinda stupid to castrate a 12-Core CPU to an 8Core and dont make use of features one paid for, so i did the following: What i knew already, is that MSFS and for example the FENIX AddOn dont work very well with the E-Cores. So, yesterday i spent some time to optimise my system, especially CPU (i7-12700K), so i dont have to spend a lot of money on a 7950X3D

Is there a suggestion to use Process Lasso with a more mild setting where the CPU runs at, say, at 80☌ maximum? Since detecting the high temps I exit Process Lasso when simming, but with a mixed feelings. Even if it runs, it will shorten the lifetime of the CPU.

#Process lasso probalance Pc

The author of Process Lasso claims in a slightly older forum thread: “any properly built PC should be able to handle even a 100% CPU load indefinitely”.Ĭontrary to this, you often find the suggestion not to exceed ~85☌, and never exceed 95☌. There are different opinions on this, though: The reason is clear, I am CPU-limited (as are most of us) and the GPU could push out more but the CPU is lagging.Īs I said, the system is running fine, but I am concerned about CPU temperatures. I get > 100 fps (using DLSS) on the 2D screen when running with Process Lasso but around 60 fps without it (same settings and situation). When checking CPU temperature I found it’s >90☌ most of the time when simming and often even close to 100☌, where it’s throttled down. The whole system works excellently, not to say perhaps slightly too good. I have been using Process Lasso with the Bitsum Highest Performance Profile. I bought a new Intel i7-13700K / Nvidia 4080 based system (detail in my profile). I know this is an old thread but my question fits exactly.